Mise en Scene

2004 Solo exhibition

Excerpt from press release:

For his installation … Zane uses video, drawing and sculpture to imitate a crime scene. The observer is left to build a narrative from viewing the scene, an activity that Zane views as parallel to the process of extracting meaning from art in a gallery or museum setting. In his own words: “It struck me awhile ago that there is this really apt analogy between an art exhibition and a crime scene. Viewers walk into a gallery and look at the evidence of an artists activity and try to piece together some sort of meaning or experience from the clues. So, basically what I have done is make an exhibition that is art as crime scene as art, where I mimic a crime scene and the different elements are art objects.”

A Pretty Good Screw

2004 exhibition

Site specific installation at the Herbert F. Johnson Museum, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY. Sept., 2004

ARTIST STATEMENT:
Besides the objects themselves, art is composed of its stories. Important events get written about and artists become famous. What we rarely hear about are the ‘near misses’, the artists who almost, but didn’t quite make it into history. Sometimes the stories of the ‘work that almost was’ are as interesting as the stories we come to know about the successes. When we are told the story of an important exhibition, the actions and intentions of the artists, curators, and critics involved are part of that narrative, as well as their histories and the little personal details that led to their momentous success. The ‘near misses’ have their stories as well, often with surprising details; anything from a petty squabble, an illness, or bad weather that fated those involved to art historical oblivion.

In 1969 Willoughby Sharp organized an exhibition, “Earth Art”, at the A.D. White house. This show would come to be known as one of the most important shows of its time. It would be the first major exhibition of Earth Art as well as a symposium featuring the participating artists. The exhibition featured works by several who subsequently gained great fame in the artworld; artists like Robert Smithson, Dennis Oppenheim, and Michael
Heizer.

Behind that narrative however, another one lurks. This story revolves around Walter de Maria (best known for his outdoor sculpture, “The Lightning Field”) and the director the museum at the time, Thomas Leavitt. De Maria was also invited to participate in the exhibition and the symposium. He did, in fact show up at Cornell to install a work, for which he wrote, with the handle from a broom, the title phrase, “Good Fuck”, in a pile of dirt he’d placed in the gallery. This caused an argument with Leavitt that culminated in de Maria’s withdrawal from the exhibition. His name was removed from all documentation, he did not participate in the symposium, and his dirt pile was swept out of the gallery (perhaps with the very broom he had used to form it).

As an artist, I find stories like these fascinating. Every institution and every artist surely has a ghost or two like this in the closet. Who knew that an argument over ‘good taste’ or ‘appropriateness’ would lead to de Maria missing out on what would become a pivotal exhibition in recent art history?

For my contribution to the “CCA Emerging Artists Exhibition”, I wish to give a nod to this particular story. I am submitting a drawing and an accompanying sculptural installation in order to pay tribute to this episode. The drawing is a portrait of Walter de Maria, drawn from a photograph taken during the year of the exhibition (1969), to be captioned with “Good Fuck,” the title phrase from de Maria’s Earth Art submission. The drawing is mounted on the wall near a sculpture, which will consists of a broom partially buried in a pile of dirt. The handle of the broom stands straight up from the pile so that the tip of the handle is at approximately head height.

The Standins

2004

Bobble-head

2004

Life size sculpture as bobble-head.

Head, Shoulders, Knees & Toes

2004

Duped

2003 Solo exhibition

DUPED! was an installation containing a series of interrelated doubles.There was a painting of where paintings were. A real plant and a plastic copy of the plant. An animatronic version of the artist and a video of the real artist. And a photograph of a set of paintings . DUPED! was presented as my MFA thesis exhibition at Cornell University in 2002.

The entire wall is a painting of where paintings used to hang. It is a painting of ‘no paintings’. One of the plants is real, the other is a plastic copy of the real plant. The sculpture and the video are the same size and height, both facing each other. The sculpture of the artist is animated, performing the same gesture as the artist does in the video. The are both copying each other. The photograph is of the wall, but this time, the paintings are in place on the wall.The paintings are of the things in the room (the plants, the sculpture and the TV that the video is played on) from above.The pedestals that the objects are on, are the same size and dimension as the canvases of the paintings.

Video Game Paintings

2003

Portraits

2003

This is an ongoing series of artist’s portraits.The source images for the portraits are all photographs of the artist’s taken during the 1970′s.